Terms of Reference for the Mid-Term Review of ChildFund International's Indonesia Country Strategic Plan (2022-2026)
Table of Contents
1. Mid-Term Review Summary
2. Background
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Country Context
3. Objectives of The Mid-term Review
3.1. Purpose of the mid-term review
3.2. Objectives
3.3. Stakeholders and Users of The Mid-term Review
4. Subject of the Mid-term Review
4.1. Childfund International Assistance in Indonesia
4.2. Mid-term Review Scope and Criteria
5. Mid-term Review Questions, Approach and Methodology
5.1. Mid-term Review Questions
5.2. Child Rights, Gender and Inclusion
5.3. Approach and Methodology
5.4. Ethical Considerations
6. Organization of the Mid-Term Review
6.1. Phases and Deliverables
6.2. Timeframe and Budget
6.3. Reviewer Team Composition
6.4. How To Apply
1. Mid-Term Review Summary
| Implementing Partner | 14 Implementing Partner |
| Project start and end dates; phase of project if applicable | Mid-term reviews implementation during period from 01 July 2021 – 30 September 2023 |
| Mid-Term Review Objectives | 1. Assess Country Strategic Plan (CSP) and Program Design Document (PDD) effectiveness and progress, focusing on outcomes, impact, and alignment with goals. 2. Extract insights for strategic refinement during CSP and PDD (2024-2026). 3. Update CSP including Appendix 3: CO Objectives and Key Areas of Activity for the Two-Year BSC Period of the Five-Year Country Strategy Period 4. Create individual reports for primary programs (CREATIVE, Active4Future, ENERGY, PRIME, and DRR) for a comprehensive review. 5. Engage stakeholders, gather feedback, ensure accountability, and guide future decisions. |
| Evaluation Type | Strategic Evaluation of the Instruments for Country Strategic Plan |
| Commissioning organization/contact person | Childfund International in Indonesia, Rahmat Hidayat, M&E Specialist |
| Primary Methodology | Mixes qualitative and quantitative methods for diverse data analysis. Engages various groups for different perspectives. Uses both primary and secondary data for core program evaluation. |
| Proposed Evaluation Start and End Dates | As soon as possible (35 working days) December 2023 – January 2024 |
| Anticipated Evaluation Report Release Date | Expected submission of final report by end of February 2023 |
| Recipient of Final Evaluation Report | International Office, Country Office, Implementing Partners |
2. Background
2.1. Introduction
These Terms of Reference (TOR) serve as a comprehensive document designed to furnish essential details to stakeholders regarding the proposed Mid-Term Review of the Childfund International in Indonesia Country Strategic Plan (2022-2026). The TOR aims to guide the review team, and outline expectations throughout the evaluation process. Its structure comprises several chapters: Chapter 1 contextualizes the information, Chapter 2 elucidates the rationale, objectives, stakeholders, and primary users of the review, Chapter 3 delineates Childfund International's assistance in Indonesia and outlines the review's scope, Chapter 4 outlines the evaluation questions, approach, and methodology, while Chapter 5 outlines the organizational structure of the review. Additionally, the annexes contain supplementary materials, including a detailed timeline.
2.2. Country Context
Indonesia, with the fourth-largest child population globally[1], is a diverse archipelago of over 17,000 islands and 1,300 ethnic groups. Children face urban challenges like poverty and pollution in cities like Jakarta, while others in remote villages struggle with basic service access.
Poverty: A key issue, poverty affects children's health, education, and safety. COVID-19 exacerbated these issues, increasing child poverty by an estimated 2.1 million[2], with a 4% rise in inter-temporal child poverty.
Early Childhood Development (ECD): ECD in Indonesia faces challenges such as limited program reach, low parental awareness, and inadequate facilities. Only 38% of children aged 3-6 participate in ECD, much lower than the targeted 77%[3].
Education: Significant progress in school completion rates contrasts with 7.6% of children (4.2 million) not in school in 2018[4]. The pandemic highlighted digital divides in education, impacting low-income and disabled students the most.
Youth Unemployment: High youth unemployment and skill gaps are pressing issues. COVID-19 worsened job market access and income levels for young people.
Children's Health and Nutrition: While maternal mortality rates have improved, they remain high. Child undernutrition is a significant concern, with high rates of stunting and wasting. Government targets aim to reduce these issues by 2030.
Child Protection: Challenges include a high rate of children without birth certificates, child marriage, and violence against children. Government plans target increased birth certificate coverage and reducing child marriage and violence.
Intolerance and Extremism: Religious and ethnic intolerance, fueled by ineffective government policies and societal attitudes, remains a concern.
Natural Disasters and Climate Change: Indonesia's location makes it prone to natural disasters. Environmental degradation and climate change pose additional risks, especially for children, with the government focusing on low-carbon strategies to mitigate these effects.
3. Objectives of The Mid-term Review
3.1. Purpose of the mid-term review
Childfund Indonesia intends to conduct a mid-term review of its Country Strategic Plan FY22-26 and its derivative, the Program Design Document. The purpose of this evaluation is to enable us to determine the impact of our work and derive learnings to inform or revise the new Program Design Document which comes into effect in July 2024. The results will also enable us to adjust our approaches to carrying out interventions to achieve targets, understand the progress made to date, challenges facing the implementation of the CSP, lessons learned so far, review the context, theory of change, the results realized (outcomes and impact) of our work and promote joint review and learning. Learning from the mid-term review will sharpen our approaches and implementation process or program learning, and accountability and make our impact vivid.
3.2. Objectives
Mid-term review serve the dual objectives of accountability and learning. As such, this review will:
1) Evaluate the progress including the reach numbers, effectiveness, and efficiency of CSP and PDD strategies and activities, focusing on outcomes, impact, and alignment with organizational goals.
2) Extract valuable insights and lessons learned from the CSP and PDD implementation, enabling informed decision-making for the refinement and improvement of strategies during the remaining CSP period (2024-2026).
3) Update the CSP Appendix Table to enter Growing Connections Phase II.
4) Generate individual evaluation reports for each primary program (CREATIVE, Active4Future, ENERGY, PRIME, and DRR), which will be incorporated into the comprehensive review document.
5) Engage with stakeholders, gather feedback, and provide transparent reporting to stakeholders, ensuring accountability and guiding future programmatic decisions for the benefit of beneficiaries and partners.
3.3. Stakeholders and Users of The Mid-term Review
The Mid-term Review is designed to capture the perspectives of a diverse group of stakeholders, both internal and external to CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL IN INDONESIA. The key stakeholders that will use the mid-term review report will include CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL IN INDONESIA staff both at CO and Implementing Partners levels, Government Partners, Local and national NGOs, and Communities (women, men, boys, girls, CBOs, etc.). The findings of this report will be used to improve targeting for the remaining half of the CSP, understand the lessons learned for the period under review, adjust strategies to fit the delivery of intended results and determine CSP progress. The report will be shared as per the dissemination plan stakeholders for accountability through feedback meetings, distribution of hard copies, brief presentations in seminars and conferences, etc.
4. Subject of the Mid-term Review
4.1. Childfund International Assistance in Indonesia
ChildFund International is a non-profit, non-sectarian, and non-political organization dedicated to the development of children and families, regardless of religion, ethnicity, gender, or political affiliation. ChildFund is a partner of the Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia in implementing humanitarian programs in Indonesia, based on a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Ministry of Social Affairs and Childfund International in Indonesia.
ChildFund has been working in Indonesia and has had a Memorandum of Understanding with the Ministry of Social Affairs since 1973. Currently, we collaborate with 14 local partners in 30 districts/cities and 172 villages, committed to supporting the Ministry of Social Affairs in improving the lives of Indonesian children. Overall, ChildFund's programs in Indonesia have benefited more than 13 million children and families.
ChildFund's service areas in Indonesia cover eight provinces: South Sumatra, Lampung, DKI Jakarta, Banten, West Java, Central Java, Yogyakarta Special Region, and East Nusa Tenggara.
ChildFund's program activities in Indonesia are based on the stages of child development according to their age:
· CREATIVE (Caregiver Responsive and Active for Infant Development) is a vital program dedicated to nurturing children aged 0-5 years. Emphasizing early childhood development creates supportive environments within families and communities. This initiative empowers caregivers, enhancing their skills to optimize children's growth. By engaging stakeholders and advocating a social accountability approach, CREATIVE urges local governments to allocate resources for children's basic rights. Through responsive parenting programs and quality Early Childhood Education services, CREATIVE facilitates the continuous transfer of skills, ensuring active caregiver participation and holistic development of young children.
· ACTIVE4FUTURE (Adolescent, Confident in Thinking and Valued Life for Future) is dedicated to children aged 6-14, focusing on education and self-confidence. The program enhances parent-child interactions, teaching vital life skills and fostering positive communication. ACTIVE4FUTURE equips youngsters with financial literacy, enabling confident and responsible choices. This intervention empowers youth for healthy decision-making and strengthens stakeholders to ensure a secure environment. Through positive parenting and life skills education, ACTIVE4FUTURE shapes capable, self-assured adolescents, emphasizing both personal growth and community safety.
· ENERGY (Enhancing and Empowering Youth) focuses on the holistic development of young people aged 15-24. Recognizing the complexities of this phase, the program emphasizes skills development and active participation. With close guidance, adolescents and young adults receive crucial life skills education, enabling them to tackle challenges and contribute positively to their communities. ENERGY prepares youth for formal employment and business settings through comprehensive training. Additionally, it encourages their active involvement as change agents, ensuring the realization of children's rights and supporting family and community well-being. Through youth work readiness and agency components, ENERGY shapes responsible, capable citizens, fostering personal growth and community progress.
· PRIME (Protective and Friendly Environment for Children and Youth) strives to create safe spaces for children and young people aged 0-24. Engaging various stakeholders and caregivers, it builds protective systems, linking informal child protection methods to formal services. The program empowers community cadres and youth volunteers, ensuring children's voices are heard and rights are protected. Integrated into ChildFund's initiatives, PRIME fosters sustainable community responsiveness, aiming for child-friendly environments and holding duty bearers accountable for fulfilling children's rights.
· Reduction and Adaptation of Risks (ARR) strengthens partners' capacities in emergency preparedness, response, and creating safe schools. This involves active participation in natural disasters, empowering youth in risk mapping, and influencing local governments. ChildFund establishes child-friendly spaces in affected areas and actively engages youth in developing village emergency plans.
For ChildFund, it is essential that children, families, and communities have the capacity to reduce disaster risk exposure and are protected from the impacts of disasters.
ChildFund Indonesia strategically aligns its programs with both community needs and institutional donor priorities. While traditional funding sources like alliance members and foundations remain vital, the organization is diversifying through non-traditional models such as impact investment and public-private partnerships. Exploring local registration, despite evolving regulations, is part of their adaptive approach. The 2022 budget revealed a gap of $3,883,908, with planned funding from various sources including private sector contributions. Effective utilization of these diverse funds is crucial for sustaining and expanding ChildFund's impactful initiatives in Indonesia.
Indonesia Country Office has approximately 37 staff as of 30 September 2023, 27 of which 73 percent is female. 93 percent of staff are based in the capital Jakarta, and 7 percent of staff are based in Yogyakarta and Kupang.
4.2. Mid-term Review Scope and Criteria
The evaluation will encompass all of Childfund's activities from 2022 to mid-2023. The unit of analysis is the Country Strategic Plan and its derivative, the Program Design Document, understood as the collection of strategic outcomes, outputs, activities, and inputs outlined in the CSP document approved by the ChildFund International Office, as well as any subsequent approved budget revisions. In this context, the focus will be on assessing Childfund International in Indonesia's contributions to CSP strategic outcomes and establishing plausible causal relations between Childfund International in Indonesia activities' outputs, the implementation process, the operational environment, and the observed changes at the outcome level, including any unintended positive or negative consequences.
The mid-term review will adhere to standard UNEG and OECD/DAC evaluation criteria, specifically relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability, as well as connectedness, coherence, and coverage where applicable. Additionally, it will analyze Childfund International in Indonesia's partnership strategy, including its strategic positioning amid complex and dynamic contexts, especially concerning national governments and the international community. The review will also pay attention to assessing adherence to child protection policy, humanitarian principles, and accountability to populations affected by Childfund International in Indonesia's assistance.
5. Mid-term Review Questions, Approach and Methodology
5.1. Mid-term Review Questions
The review will address four main questions that are common to all ChildFund Indonesia CSPs. The review team will further develop and tailor these questions in a detailed Mid-Term Review Matrix during the inception phase, considering gender differences in the potential roles of indirect beneficiaries, disaggregated by sex and age.
| Q1 – To what extent is Childfund Indonesia's strategic position, role and specific contribution based on country priorities, global strategy and people's needs as well as CFI's strengths? | |
| 1.1 | To what extent is the CSP relevant to national policies, plans, strategies and goals, including achievement of the national Sustainable Development Goals? |
| 1.2 | To what extent are the key programming and advocacy priorities (CREATIVE, ACTIVE4FUTURE, ENERGY, PRIME, and ARR), addressing the most pressing needs of different life stages (0-5 years, 6-14 years, 15-24 years) of children in the targeted communities, as well as the needs at village level? |
| 1.3 | To what extent has Childfund Indonesia's strategic positioning remained relevant throughout the implementation of the CSP considering changing context, national capacities and needs? |
| 1.4 | To what extent is the CSP coherent and aligned with the Growing Connections Global Strategy ensuring that the objectives, activities, and partnerships established within the CSP are consistent with the overarching goals and priorities of the Growing Connections initiative? |
| EQ2 – What is the extent and quality of CFI's specific contribution to CSP strategic outcomes in Indonesia? | |
| 2.1 | To what extent did CFI deliver expected outputs and contribute to the expected CSP strategic outcomes? |
| 2.2 | To what extent did CFI contribute to achievement of cross-cutting aims (education for protection and well-being, Adaptation and Risk Reduction, diversity, equity, inclusion gender equality and other equity considerations)? |
| 2.3 | To what extent are the achievements of the CSP likely to be sustainable? |
| 2.4 | Is there coherence and integration between ChildFund Indonesia's different program streams (responsive parenting, early childhood development, life skills, online safety, etc.), ensuring they complement and enhance each other for a more comprehensive impact? |
| EQ3 – To what extent has CFI's used its resources efficiently in contributing to CSP outputs and strategic outcomes? | |
| 3.1 | To what extent is ChildFund Indonesia's resource allocation, including the mobilized 23 million USD, efficiently utilized to maximize the impact on children's lives, considering the balance between sponsorship and grants? |
| 3.2 | To what extent were outputs delivered within the intended timeframe? |
| 3.3 | To what extent was coverage and targeting of interventions appropriate? |
| 3.4 | To what extent were CFI's activities cost-efficient in delivery of its assistance? |
| 3.5 | How efficiently are digitalization efforts being implemented, particularly in birth registration, soft skills and work readiness courses, branding, marketing, and youth-led digital interventions? |
| EQ4 – What are the factors that explain CFI performance and the extent to which it has made the strategic shift expected by the CSP? | |
| 4.1 | To what extent did CFI analyse or use existing evidence on the parenting, early child education, work readiness, child protection challenges, disaster preparedness in the country to develop the CSP and Program Design Document |
| 4.2 | To what extent has CSP been able to mobilize adequate, predictable and flexible resources to finance the CSP? |
| 4.3 | To what extent did the CSP lead to partnerships and collaborations with other actors that positively influenced performance and results? |
| 4.4 | To what extent did the CSP provide greater flexibility in dynamic operational contexts and how did it affect results? |
| 4.5 | What are the other factors that can explain CFI performance and the extent to which it has made the strategic shift expected by the CSP? |
5.2. Child Rights, Gender and Inclusion
Strict ethical procedures should be adhered to when dealing with human subjects. The
following ethical considerations will be considered during the needs assessment:
· Prior to the survey, a safeguarding risk assessment will be conducted to determine the level of harm that will impact on the children and adolescents or exposing children to harm. In addition, data collectors and all persons who will be interacting with children will be trained on safeguarding and sign our policy.
· Ethical clearance from the MEL Global will be got prior to data collection where a third party is engaged on this assignment.
· Informed consent will be collected for all consenting adults before both the interview and taking of pictures. For children, the guardian's consent will be collected. All data collection tools should contain a consent release section. Ensure that interviewees understand what they are consenting to.
· Confidentiality and safeguarding sensitive information that communities share with us will be ensured. This is particularly very important for child protection section. All teams collecting data need to be trained on this, especially enumerators.
· Commitment to follow up –an ethical approach to assessments also requires a commitment to respond to urgent situations. Assessment teams should be aware that where they see situations requiring urgent action to save lives, they should quickly relay the information to team leaders for either referrals or response. Examples of this can be coming across grave violations of child rights, severe malnutrition cases etc.
· Sensitive questions will only be asked by well trained and experienced enumerators with gender considerations thus a female enumerator will interview female respondents or groups of respondents. In this case only team leaders will ask these questions and they will be included under Key Informant interview tools.
· Where external enumerators will be involved, they will sign commitment form to declare that they will not discuss, transmit or expose any data/information of respondent/community to any external person apart from Childfund International
· The evaluations should seek to prioritise a focus on child rights, gender and inclusion and try to understand the extent to which the project or programme applied to gender and inclusion-sensitive approaches and explicitly aimed for results that improve the rights of children and young people and gender equality.
5.3. Approach and Methodology
An appropriate mix of qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to gather and analyze data/information, diversify the perspective of the evaluation, and promote the participation of different groups of stakeholders. The final detailed mid-term review methodology will be developed in consultation with Childfund International in Indonesia. The mid-term review encompasses collection of primary and secondary data to inform the status of Childfund International In Indonesia core programme areas framework and its indicators. The evaluation will be done retrospectively for to determine the impact of our work in cases where baseline figures cannot be got.
The consultant team will be expected to review the TOR and come up with a robust methodology, plan, and tools that will be used to deliver the mid-term review. The proposed design will be reviewed and refined at the proposal stage but further firmed at the inception stage. All the proposed methods, plans and tools will be approved by Childfund before utilization. Data triangulation is required to ensure the credibility and accuracy of data/ information gathered through various tools.
The methods proposed to undertake this review must be of sound technical quality, scientifically consistent, rigorous and robust, be gender transformative and respond to the needs outlined in the terms of reference. The data collection tools including household/participant surveys, FGD templates, key informant guides, and observation tools though not limited will be reviewed and approved by Childfund before deployment. The consultant and Childfund International In Indonesia will harmonize their understanding of the tools and their administration in the inception meeting before the administration of the questionnaires by data collectors to be identified and trained by the consultant with support from the Childfund International In Indonesia.
Ethical considerations, particularly regarding child protection and safeguarding, will be at the forefront of the methodology. The proposal will explicitly outline how these issues will be incorporated into the design, tools, and data collection processes. Additionally, the tools will be specifically designed to incorporate gender analysis, ensuring that the data gathered provide insights into gender dynamics and represent diverse views from a gender lens. This thorough and meticulously planned approach will guarantee the robustness and effectiveness of the mid-term review, aligning with the organization's commitment to excellence and inclusivity.
For interview and FGD (Focus Group Discussion) activities, consider prioritizing the following area:
5.4. Ethical Considerations
Childfund International is committed to ensuring that the rights of those participating in data collection or analysis are respected and protected, and to act in accordance with Childfund Safeguarding Policy, the ethical standards and research and evaluation standards in Indonesia. All applicants should include details in their proposal on how they will ensure ethics and child protection in the data collection process. Specifically, the consultant(s) shall explain how appropriate, safe, non-discriminatory participation of all stakeholders will be ensured and how special attention will be paid to the needs of youth and other vulnerable groups. The consultant(s) shall also explain how confidentiality and anonymity of participants will be guaranteed. The consultant(s) will have to sign Childfund Safeguarding Policy before commencement of the assignment.
6. Organization of the Mid-Term Review
6.1. Phases and Deliverables
Some of the key steps in the conduct of the mid-term review are:
a. Identification of consultants: This is an internal process to complete the TOR and
identify the most suitable qualified consultants to conduct the mid-term review.
b. Inception phase: The consultant team will have a kick off meeting together with Childfund International In Indonesia team to understand the CSP and to collect required documents such as country strategic plan, program design document, M&E logical framework and indicator reference sheets. The consultant team shall submit an electronic copy of the draft inception report as stated in the agreement. Before preparing inception report, review all the relevant internal and external documents, the consultant team should engage with relevant staff to come to a consensus on the evaluation methodology including sampling, data collection, analysis and field visit plan. The draft inception report will include a detailed methodology including sampling framework along with tools to be used to gather data/information. The inception report should be approved by the Childfund International In Indonesia before starting data collection.
c. Data collection Phase: The consultant will be expected to develop a data collection plan, identify data collectors in consultation with Childfund International In Indonesia teams, train the data collectors on the tools and ethical issues including safeguarding, and conduct validity and reliability tests on the tools before data collection. The consultant will then be expected to establish and share with Childfund International In Indonesia data quality assurance mechanisms, data cleaning, and data entry.
d. Finalizing the evaluation report; this phase shall entail - Presentation: the preliminary results of the assessment will be shared for validation with the Childfund International In Indonesia team after completion of data/information analysis by the consultant team. - Draft evaluation report, including the individual report for primary programs (CREATIVE, Active4Future, ENERGY, PRIME, and DRR). This report will be shared after incorporating feedback that is received during the presentation, validation, and other specific concerns and input that will be given by Childfund International In Indonesia technical program leads, M&E teams and other reviewers.
e. Final Evaluation report: The final report may be prepared after a few iterations of the report if the quality standards are not met within the first round. The Final report format is included in this TOR. The final report should include the completed analytical framework of the assessment (Indicator matrix). The final report will be annexed with the individual reports for primary programs, completed M&E framework and annual targets. The review and revision process from the draft report stage to the final report should be within 30 working days. The soft copy of the completed database should be handed over to the M&E teams with the final report.
f. Reports: The following outputs will be produced in both English and Indonesian versions: a) Draft Soft copy of the inception report including survey tools and analytical framework; b) Both soft and hard copy of the final inception report including final translated survey tools, sampling, methodology and analytical framework; c) Electronic copy of draft report. d) PowerPoint with Preliminary Presentation of finding for validation e) Draft soft copy of the final report including data sets f) Both soft copy and hard copy (designed by internal communication teams) of the final study report including datasets;
g. Popular Version: In addition to the final report, Childfund International In Indonesia will expect the consultant to create a concise, user-friendly, popular version of the mid-term review report. This version limited to 15 pages, is specifically tailored for external stakeholders using simple, easy-to-read, and child-friendly language.
The consultant team is expected to deliver the following products or complete the following key tasks at the estimated due dates indicated below
| Deliverable | Format | Length | Due Date | Detail |
| Inception Report | Ms Word | 15 pgs Max | 5 days after inception meeting | · an updated timeline. · a study matrix · detailed methodology, including draft sampling methodology and size; · draft data collection tools; · ethical considerations; · consent forms for primary data collection; · (draft) methods for data analysis; · brief justification of the methods and techniques used (including relevant underlying values and assumptions/ theories) with a justification of the selections made (e.g. of persons interviewed). |
| Draft Mid-term Review report | Ms Word | Max 40 Pgs. (excluding annexes) | 10 days after data collection | Draft outline: a. Cover page b. Table of contents c. Preliminaries (Abbreviations, acknowledgments) d. Table of contents e. List of Tables f. List of Figures g. Executive summary h. Introduction i. Objectives of the mid-term review j. Main review questions and sub-questions k. Limitations of the evaluation l. Methodologies used and justifications m. Key evaluation Findings in line with the objectives of the study (per main program) n. Conclusion and Recommendations (per main program) o. References (Full bibliography in APA format) p. Annexes - Main Program Individual Reports - Study tools - Cleaned data sets - Consent forms |
| Final Evaluation Report (including Executive Summary) | MS word and | Max 40 Pgs. (excluding annexes) | 5 days after receiving final comments from reviewers | · All sections as in draft report (well written robust analysis with clear themes on the implementation practice in a simple, comprehensive and easy to understand format. · PowerPoint slides of the report |
| Final Data Collection Tools |
|
|
| · Annexed to the final report |
| Cleaned Data (including transcripts) |
|
|
| · Includes audios and pictures |
| Completed Consent Forms |
|
|
| · Presented together with final payment invoice |
| Other Communication Products for Dissemination |
|
|
| · Presentation slides for the validation and dissemination |
| Popular Version |
| 15 pages Max |
| · Word version |
6.2. Timeframe and Budget
The consultant is expected to submit a detailed execution plan within a reasonable and realistic number of days which will not be more than 35 working days from the time the internally collected data is handed over to them.
The financial cost should be worked out in line with the proposed design of the review approaches. This is a consultancy assignment with limited budget provision. The financial proposal should therefore at least include details against the following.
| Item Description | Unit Cost | Unit | Volume | Total Amount |
| Professional Fee |
|
|
|
|
| Data Collection |
|
|
|
|
| Data processing and analysis |
|
|
|
|
| Report writing |
|
|
|
|
| Other cost such as VAT/Taxes, travel costs, Expenses / per diem, translation costs (Kindly justify the cost line item). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3. Reviewer Team Composition
The required skills and competences for the consultant are:
· The lead consultant must have a minimum qualification of Masters or a PhD Degree in any of these areas (International development, public health, nutrition, early childhood education, youth entrepreneurship, Disaster Management and Child protection with expertise in and experience in quantitative and qualitative research, evaluation and documentation.
· An integrated team of consultants in the thematic areas of Child Protection, Gender, Nutrition, disaster and resilience, youth employment and entrepreneurship and early childhood education
· One of the team members must have over 6 year's experience in research, Monitoring
and Evaluation and experience conducting large-scale evaluations.
· Significant experience in monitoring and evaluation, including hands-on experience in designing and undertaking mid-term review studies of child program and development interventions.
· Proven analytical, problem-solving and mixed method skills from gender sensitive.
perspective
· Excellent interpersonal communication skills, interviewing skills, writing skills, demonstrated ability to work cooperatively with clients, and ability to liaise tactfully as a member of a multicultural team with proven ability to interact proactively with client.
6.4. How To Apply
Applicants should submit their application to indonesiaoffice@childfund.org by December 29, 2023. Please write "ChildFund Indonesia CSP Mid-term Review" in the subject of the e-mail. The application should include (i) a cover letter, (ii) a Team CV or Statement of Qualifications that summarizes the applicant's suitability for the position based on the above qualification criteria, (iii) list of similar portfolio with 1-2 report example and, (iv) a brief document of approximately three pages outlining how you propose to conduct the evaluation based on the detailed scope of work, that include an overview of the evaluation design, data collection, data analysis plan and detailed budget.
Please note that the final selection of team members will be subject to the decision of the ChildFund International in Indonesia selection procedure.
ONLY SHORTLISTED CANDIDATES WILL BE CONTACTED
THE CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL IN INDONESIA IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES EMPLOYER. WOMEN AND MINORITIESARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO APPLY.
0 Comments:
Posting Komentar